INEC Chairman Succession: NPSA Calls for Low‑Key Successor as Yakubu Nears Exit

INEC Chairman Succession: NPSA Calls for Low‑Key Successor as Yakubu Nears Exit
26 September 2025 6 Comments Koketso Mashika

Yakubu’s decade at the helm

Professor Mahmood Yakubu entered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in 2015, clinching the maximum two‑term allowance that lets him serve for ten years. During that span he supervised the 2019 and 2023 general elections, making him the longest‑serving INEC chairman since the nation returned to civilian rule in 1999. His tenure has been a mixed bag: supporters praise smoother logistical arrangements, while critics point to lingering disputes over vote tallying and allegations of bias.

As October 2025 approaches, the spotlight shifts to the inevitable hand‑over. The transition is more than a bureaucratic shuffle; it’s a cornerstone for the legitimacy of the 2027 elections, especially with President Bola Tinubu likely seeking a second term.

What the NPSA wants from the next chair

What the NPSA wants from the next chair

The Nigeria Political Science Association (NPSA) has weighed in, urging that the successor "talk less" than Yakubu. According to the NPSA president, a quieter chair would help restore public confidence in INEC’s impartiality.

  • Low‑profile communication: Limit public statements that could be interpreted as partisan.
  • Technical competence: Deep understanding of electoral law and digital voting tools.
  • Integrity record: A clear track record free from controversies or allegations of favoritism.
  • Collaboration skills: Ability to work with parties, civil society, and international observers without appearing to favour any side.

The emphasis on “talk less” is not about silencing the commission but about curbing the perception that the chair can sway outcomes through rhetoric. In a country where electoral rumors spread quickly, a restrained voice might dampen speculation and keep the focus on the process, not the personality.

Speculation about Yakubu’s status has already sparked a wave of misinformation. The presidency publicly dismissed rumors of his dismissal, while other outlets hinted at a directive for Yakubu to go on terminal leave. No official confirmation has emerged, leaving the political arena buzzing with conjecture.

Analysts note that the eventual appointment will be a litmus test for President Tinubu’s own commitment to a level playing field. If the new chair is seen as an extension of the current administration, opposition parties and watchdog groups could challenge the credibility of the 2027 vote, potentially leading to legal battles and street protests.

Stakeholders across the spectrum—political parties, civil society groups, and international partners—are watching the selection process closely. Their collective expectation: a successor who can steer INEC through the next electoral cycle with transparency, efficiency, and, most importantly, a perceived independence that reassures the Nigerian electorate.

6 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Angie Ponce

    September 28, 2025 AT 04:24
    So let me get this straight-NPSA wants the next chair to 'talk less'? Like, silence is the new integrity? That’s not leadership, that’s cowardice. If you’re not going to defend the process publicly, who will? The opposition will fill that void with lies, and then we’ll all be screaming about fraud again. Stop pretending neutrality means muting yourself. Speak up or get out.

    And while we’re at it, why is no one asking if the next chair will actually be independent? Or if they’re just another Tinubu loyalist in a fancy suit?
  • Image placeholder

    Andrew Malick

    September 29, 2025 AT 17:30
    The notion that a low-profile chair will restore confidence is a semantic illusion. Confidence isn’t built by silence-it’s built by demonstrable institutional integrity. The problem isn’t Yakubu’s media presence; it’s the structural decay of electoral accountability in Nigeria. The commission lacks independent audit trails, transparent voter verification systems, and real-time data access for observers. Until those are fixed, no amount of quietude will matter.

    Also, 'talk less' is a euphemism for 'don’t challenge the status quo.' That’s not reform. That’s compliance.
  • Image placeholder

    will haley

    September 29, 2025 AT 19:32
    I just watched a video of Yakubu in 2023 saying 'the people have spoken' after a controversial result and I swear to god I cried. Not because it was right-but because it felt like the last honest man in the room. Now they want someone who whispers? What’s next? A chair who communicates via smoke signals?

    They’re not looking for a leader. They’re looking for a ghost.
  • Image placeholder

    Laura Hordern

    October 1, 2025 AT 07:32
    Look, I get it-Nigeria’s electoral process is like a car with a broken odometer and a driver who keeps changing the route. Yakubu was loud, sure, but at least he was *there*, in the driver’s seat, yelling at the traffic, arguing with the GPS, trying to make the damn thing work. Now they want someone who just sits quietly and nods when the president says 'turn left'? That’s not leadership, that’s a passenger with a seatbelt on.

    And honestly? The whole 'talk less' thing feels like a cultural misunderstanding. In Nigeria, where misinformation spreads faster than Lagos traffic, silence doesn’t mean calm-it means vacuum. And guess what fills vacuums? Rumors. Conspiracy theories. Fake tally sheets on WhatsApp groups. Someone has to speak, even if it’s just to say 'this is what we saw.'
  • Image placeholder

    Brittany Vacca

    October 2, 2025 AT 04:38
    I think the NPSA has a point 🤔 I mean, less talking = less chance of misinterpretation. And honestly, the chair doesn’t need to be a celebrity. Just someone who knows the rules, follows them, and doesn’t get caught on camera laughing with one party’s rep. I hope they pick someone with a clean record. #Transparency #ElectoralIntegrity
  • Image placeholder

    Lucille Nowakoski

    October 3, 2025 AT 15:23
    I’ve been following this closely and I think we’re missing the bigger picture. The real issue isn’t whether the next chair talks too much or too little-it’s whether the appointment process itself is transparent. If the president picks someone behind closed doors with no public vetting, no parliamentary hearings, no civil society input, then it doesn’t matter if they’re quiet or loud. The damage is already done. We need a process that invites trust, not just a person who tries to avoid controversy. Let’s focus on how they’re chosen, not just how they speak.

    Also, if we want real change, we need to invest in tech infrastructure-biometric verification, blockchain-backed results, independent audit panels. No amount of silence fixes a broken system.

Write a comment